Yaffe: If Canadians got to vote on how to allocate $100 million in public spending, it's possible not a single taxpayer would opt to keep funding the Senate. And that notion, at last, could provide an answer to the century-old conundrum of how to get rid... MORE...

• CFIA recalls sandwich products in Atlantic Canada over Listeria fears
  The Canadian Food Inspection Agency and King’s Processing Ltd. of Alberton, PEI, are warning the public not to consume certain sandwich products because they may be contaminated with Listeria.
  

• Manitoba NDP tied with Tories, poll finds
  The New Democrats have caught back up to the Conservatives and are dominating public support within the City of Winnipeg, says a Probe Research Inc. survey of 1,000 Manitoba adults released today.

• Saskatoon names road after former Playboy playmate Shannon Tweed

• William and Kate to take the capital
  Canada's future king will arrive in Ottawa Thursday to kick off his first tour of the country with new wife Kate Middleton.

To The editor,

Fixed election dates is an issue both federally and provincially. In  2006 Mr. Harper brought in legislation to limit the term of a federal government to four years; thereby fixing the date of the next general election to the fall of 2009. An election begins when the Prime Minister asks the Governor General to dissolve Parliament and to authorize the writs of election. Assuming the government has not lost confidence, the timing of the election call resides completely with the Prime Minister and is a considerable advantage for the leading party. By taking advantage of short-term events, opposition weakness, or sudden good news the Prime Minister can sway an election to his or her advantage. As a result governments may be winning elections they otherwise would not and manipulation of election dates for political gain erodes the citizen’s view that elections are important and should be participated in. So fixed election dates are correctly deemed a good thing. Mr. Harper said it himself in 2006, “ … fixed election dates stop leaders from trying to manipulate the calendar simply for partisan political advantage."

However fixed election dates cannot work. Why? Canada and its provinces use a confidence system of governance. If the government looses the confidence of the House it must resign and an election must be called to restore confidence regardless of any fixed election date scheme. Also the right of a Prime Minister to ask for dissolution of Parliament is constitutionally protected. Any law passed by Parliament fixing election dates cannot interfere with that power. So even with fixed election dates on the books what sanctions can be used to prevent a Prime Minister from calling an election by resigning before the next election date? And this of course is precisely what happened and why we went to the polls a full year before the ‘fixed’ date.

Fixed election dates is a needed reform but is incompatible with our confidence-style of governance. So let us take a hard look at whether Canada and its provinces should move beyond confidence based governance.

Jonathan Dean
Leader, The Atlantica Party
Bedford, NS
902.446.6694

Re: Reader Reaction to 'Way To Go Soldier Boys'

first off, to dear "russ" (whatever his real name might be):  canadians are not accustomed to losing.  we have a far better military track record than america because a) we don't engage in unnecessary hostilities and b) we're the ones everybody comes running to to clean up the mess that's been made.  we didn't ask you lot to invade the middle east; y'all did that all on your little lonesome after bullying a few other neighbourhood kids into joining your gang of crips.

to the three together:  redsox3016, "russ", and JB - you're a fine shining example of everything for which your boys are dying over there, aren't you?  totally without class and too cowardly to publish your real names.

JB:  go to school and get an education.  your diatribe was rife with spelling and grammatical errors that would make your mother blush were she to read it.

bottom line, boys (cause i know none of you are women and certainly not men): my son-in-law is in the military, both my older daughters served as cadets and so will my youngest when she's of age.  i totally support the military but i do not support the jobs your illiterate and cowardly boss is
ordering.  it's patently obvious to the rest of the world that the only reason duh-bya ordered the invasion was to get control of the oil reserves.  what happened to all that fine talk about how cheap gas was going to be once the war was won?  it's higher than ever now and all we get are mealy-mouthed excuses about how it was "artificially suppressed" before and the price is just now "self-correcting" (and that's when venezuela isn't being blamed)!

so tell you what:  you three are so darned patriotic, why aren't your butts over there on the line?

please note that i'm not afraid to sign my real name:

silja hare
toronto, ontario